Functional interactions of an <i>Escherichia coli</i> ribosomal ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gene encoding ribosome-bound ATPase (RbbA), which occurs bound to 70S ribosomes and 30S subunits, has been identified. The amino-acid sequence of RbbA reveals the presence of two ATP-binding domains in the N-terminal half of the protein. RbbA harbors an intrinsic ATPase activity that is stimulated by both 70S ribosomes and 30S subunits. Here we show that purified recombinant RbbA markedly stimulates polyphenylalanine synthesis in the presence of the elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G) and that the hydrolysis of ATP by RbbA is required to stimulate synthesis. RbbA is reported to have affinity for EF-Tu but not for EF-G. Additionally, RbbA copurifies with 30S ribosomal subunits and can be crosslinked to the ribosomal protein S1. Studies using a spectrum of antibiotics, including some of similar function, revealed that hygromycin, which binds to the 30S subunit, has a significant effect on the ATPase activity and on the affinity of RbbA for ribosomes. A possible role for RbbA in protein-chain elongation is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".