X-ray and Neutron Reflectometry Investigation of Langmuir−Blodgett Films of Cellulose Ethers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Langmuir-Blodgett films of a series of cellulose ethers are investigated by X-ray and neutron reflectometry. Two types of samples are considered: simple alkyl ethers of cellulose and derivatives obtained by the alkylation of (2-hydroxypropyl)cellulose (HPC). All of the cellulose ethers form stable monolayers at the air-water interface. Significant differences are, however, found in the surface pressure-area compression isotherms. Ethers prepared from HPC typically exhibit larger limiting molecular areas and higher surface pressures than the corresponding simple cellulose ethers. The ease of monolayer transfer to hydrophobic silicon substrates differs greatly from one type of molecule to another. Successful transfer conditions are found only for ethers that form stable monolayers at sufficiently high surface pressures. Surprisingly, deuterated HPC ethers, prepared for neutron reflectivity measurements, exhibit monolayer properties significantly different from those of their hydrogenated analogues. Although essentially identical limiting molecular areas are found, the surface pressure corresponding to a characteristic plateau transition in the compression isotherm is found to decrease by about 8-10 mN m(-1) upon side chain deuteration. X-ray reflectivity results show a linear increase of film thickness with the number of deposited layers, indicating a regular and reproducible transfer. Observed average layer spacings are, however, significantly smaller than the calculated length of fully extended side chains. Neutron reflectivity curves recorded for composite LB films composed of both deuterated and hydrogenated polymers exhibit regular Keissig fringes, but no Bragg peak. This result indicates that these LB films do not possess an internal periodic structure and the initial layer-by-layer organization is lost by large interlayer diffusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".