Speciation of Submicrogram per Liter Levels of Arsenic in Water: On-Site Species Separation Integrated with Sample Collection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Speciation of arsenic is crucial for assessing health implications from arsenic ingestion and for effective removal of arsenic from water. We report a method for the speciation of submicrogram per liter levels of arsenic in water. The method incorporates water sample collection with on-site arsenic species separation. The method is based on selective retention of arsenic species on specific solid-phase cartridges followed by selective elution and hydride generation atomic fluorescence analysis of the arsenic species. The use of a membrane filter, a resin-based strong cation-exchange cartridge, and a silica-based strong anion-exchange cartridge allows for the speciation of particulate arsenic and soluble arsenite, arsenate, monomethylarsonate, and dimethylarsinate species. Detection limit is on the order of 0.05 μg/L. The method is suitable for direct water sample collection and on-site separation of arsenic species by flowing a measured volume of water sample through the filter and cartridges connected in serial. A particular advantage of this approach is to maintain the integrity of original arsenic species in the sample. It overcomes the common problem of instability of arsenic species after water sampling and during sample storage and handling. Applications of the method are demonstrated to the speciation of arsenic in well water, raw (untreated) river water, bottled water, and a standard reference material (SRM 1643d). Results agree well with the certified values of the SRM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it