MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015852155 · doi:10.1080/00071660802635347

Prediction of wheat chemical and physical characteristics and nutritive value by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

2009· article· en· W2015852155 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Poultry Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDry matterStarchAmenAnimal scienceFood scienceChemistryAmyloseNear infrared reflectance spectroscopyOrganic matterBroilerWeight gainIleumDigestion (alchemy)AgronomyBiologyBody weightBiochemistryNear-infrared spectroscopyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. The aims of this study were to investigate the potential of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict the chemical and physical characteristics of wheat and also to predict the nutritive value of wheat for broiler chickens. 2. A total of 164 wheat samples, collected from a wide range of different sources (England, Northern Ireland and Canada), varieties and years, were used in this study. 3. Chemical and physical parameters measured included specific weight, thousand grain weight, in vitro viscosity, gross energy, nitrogen, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), starch, total and soluble non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), lysine, threonine, amylose, hardness, rate of starch digestion and protein profiles. 4. A total of 94 wheat samples were selected for inclusion in three bird trials and included at 650 g/kg in a typical UK starter/grower diet. Birds were housed in individual wire metabolism cages from 7 to 28 d and offered water and food ad libitum. Dry matter intake (DMI), live weight gain (LWG) and gain:feed ratio were measured weekly. A balance collection was carried out from d 14 to 21 for determination of apparent metabolisable energy (AME), ME:gain and dry matter retention. At 28 d the birds were humanely killed, the contents of the jejunum removed for determination of in vivo viscosity and the contents of the ileum removed for determination of ileal dry matter, starch and protein digestibility. 5. The wheat samples were scanned as whole and milled wheat, both dried and undried and NIRS calibrations, first excluding and then including the Canadian wheat samples, were developed. 6. NIRS calibrations for milled wheat samples may be useful for determining specific weight (R(cv)(2) = 0.75, for milled wheat dried), nitrogen (R(cv)(2) = 0.983 for milled and dried) and rate of starch digestion (R(cv)(2) = 0.791 for milled, dried and undried). 7. NIRS calibrations for whole wheat samples (undried) may be useful for determining wheat nutritive value, with good predictions for live weight gain (R(cv)(2) = 0.817) and feed conversion efficiency (R(cv)(2) = 0.825). 8. Inclusion of the Canadian wheat samples in the NIRS analysis provided additional robust calibrations for gross energy (R(cv)(2) = 0.86, dried and milled) and starch content (R(cv)(2) = 0.79, undried and milled). 9. This study shows that NIR is a useful tool in the accurate and rapid determination of wheat chemical parameters and nutritive value and could be extremely beneficial to both the poultry and wheat industry. 10. Further extension of the dataset would be recommended to further validate these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it