MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015857311 · doi:10.2118/127719-ms

Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Three-Phase Flow Under High-Pressure Air Injection (HPAI)

2010· article· en· W2015857311 on OpenAlex
E. Niz-Velásquez, R.G. Moore, K. C. van Fraassen, S. A. Mehta, M.G. Ursenbach

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImbibitionPetroleum engineeringMultiphase flowRelative permeabilityFlue gasCapillary pressureTwo-phase flowMechanicsWet gasMaterials scienceSaturation (graph theory)Pressure dropWater injection (oil production)Capillary actionEnvironmental scienceGeologyFlow (mathematics)ChemistryPorous mediumComposite materialPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, an improved characterization of three-phase flow under HPAI conditions was achieved based on experimental results and numerical reservoir simulation. A three-phase coreflood experiment was conducted at reservoir conditions, using 37°API stock tank oil, 84% nitrogen – 16% carbon dioxide flue gas mixture, and 3% KCl brine. The aim of the test was to evaluate the effects that the highly liquid-saturated front produced by the thermal reactions has on the mobility of each phase. Departing from connate water saturation and reservoir pressure and temperature, sequential injection of water, gas and oil was carried out, followed by a final gas flood to residual liquid saturation. Other two-and three-phase tests performed on this rock specimen were published elsewhere. Numerical history matching was employed to determine oil-water and liquid-gas relative permeability (kr) curves for both imbibition and drainage cases. A Combustion Tube (CT) test was simulated using both conventional kr curves and a set including hysteresis. The degree of hysteresis observed during the coreflood test was maintained for the CT simulation. History matching of the coreflood showed that kr to the gas phase is much smaller during liquid re-imbibition than during drainage. The use of gas phase hysteresis for the CT test allows for a better matching of liquid volumes and pressure drop. Analysis of the simulated data suggests that the reduction in gas phase mobility encourages an early increase in the oil rate, which is more consistent with experimental data than that predicted by a model with conventional kr. It also reveals that water distilled below the saturated steam temperature plays an important role on the increase of liquid saturation and oil mobilization. The improved characterization on relative permeability considering gas phase hysteresis for simulating HPAI enhances the predictive capability of the available commercial simulators, providing a more certain method to evaluate the technical and economical feasibility of a project. The ability to predict an early increase in oil rate, consistent with experimental observations, results in improved economics for the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it