Nitrogen utilization timeline of carrot over the growing season
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A timeline of nitrogen (N) dynamics of the carrot crop was developed based on studies on the effects of N application on carrot growth, N uptake and partitioning, and interactions with Alternaria [ALB; A. dauci (Kühn) Groves and Skolko] and Cercospora [CLB; C. carotae (Pass.) Solheim] leaf blight. Preplant-applied fertilizer N affects yield only when residual N in the top 60 cm of the soil profile is insufficient. The majority of the N required by the crop is taken up beyond 50 d after seeding (DAS). Carrots have a root system that extends to 150-cm depth and >50% of the fibrous root system occurs below 30-cm depth. It is likely that N below 30 cm depth is required beyond 50 DAS, since the majority of the fibrous roots are below 30 cm depth after that stage. There is insufficient time for sidedressed N to leach into the active root system beyond 50 DAS, unless its application is timed before irrigation or rain events. Regardless of the amount of residual N, preplant-applied N is essential for minimizing leaf blight severity. It is possible that leaf blight defences are conferred upon leaf emergence and may benefit from abundant N at this time. A preplant soil nitrate-N test from both the top 30 cm and the 30- to 60-cm depth could be useful for determining residual N levels and for adjusting N fertilizer application rates accordingly. Key words: Daucus carota, Alternaria leaf blight, Cercospora leaf blight, nitrogen uptake, rooting depth, fertilization
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".