MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015868353 · doi:10.1002/pros.21050

<i>SRD5A2 V89L</i> polymorphism and prostate cancer risk: A meta‐analysis

2009· review· en· W2015868353 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioConfidence intervalInternal medicineProstate cancerMeta-analysisAlleleGenetic modelSubgroup analysisAllele frequencyOncologyGastroenterologyMedicineBiologyGeneticsCancerGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Increasing studies investigating the association between steroid 5-alpha reductase type II gene polymorphism at codon 89 (SRD5A2 V89L) and susceptibility to prostate cancer (PCa) confer inconsistent results. To precisely estimate the relationship with more statistical power, a meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all case-control studies investigating such an association. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the size effect. RESULTS: Twenty-five eligible reports were identified including 8,615 cases/9,089 controls in 33 comparisons. In overall analysis, no significant associations were found in all genetic models. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity revealed that small excess PCa risks were observed in dominant model (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19 for (LL + VL) vs. VV; P < 0.01; P(heterogeneity) = 0.49) and L allele frequency comparison (OR, 1.09; 1.03-1.15 for L allele frequency; P < 0.01; P(heterogeneity) = 0.07) in Europeans. Meanwhile, SRD5A2 V89L polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased PCa risk in men aged < or =65 under the co-dominant (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.09-2.66 for LL vs. VV; P = 0.02; P(heterogeneity) = 0.31) and recessive (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.14-2.68 for LL vs. (VV + VL); P = 0.01; P(heterogeneity) = 0.12) models. However, no significant associations were found in Asians and Africans. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests SRD5A2 V89L polymorphism could play a low-penetrant role in PCa risk among Europeans and individuals younger than 65 years. Additional well-designed studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it