MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015996179 · doi:10.1159/000070103

The Effects of Posteroventral Pallidotomy on Balance Function in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

2002· article· en· W2015996179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPallidotomyParkinson's diseaseMedicineBalance (ability)Physical medicine and rehabilitationDiseaseNeurosciencePsychologyDeep brain stimulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorder resulting from dopaminergic cell loss in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra. Conventional treatment of Parkinson's disease consists of pharmacological replacement of dopamine. A treatment alternative, posteroventral pallidotomy (PVP), has been used for medically intractable stages of the disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of PVP on balance function, as measured by dynamic posturography, in patients with medically intractable Parkinson's disease. Five subjects were studied within 2 days prior to and within 6 months following PVP. Pretreatment abnormalities were found in vestibular, visual, and somatosensory processing in balance function. Posteroventral pallidotomy resulted in improvement in vestibular compensation of posture in some patients, which may be at least partially due to an improvement in latencies to respond to changes in stance. Dynamic posturography is an effective tool in the evaluation of balance and posture in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it