MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016024333 · doi:10.4043/21997-ms

Produced Water - Impact and Analysis Challenges in Cold Regions

2011· article· en· W2016024333 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly Hawboldt, Christina S. Bottaro, Worakanok Thanyamanta

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAmerican Bureau of Shipping
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceDilutionPollutantProduced waterDissolutionIce formationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringChemistryGeologyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Produced water accounts for the largest volume in the production stage of offshore oil and gas operations. There are very few studies dedicated to investigating impacts of produced water discharge in Arctic/cold regions. As exploration expands into these regions, the effects of the cold temperatures, high motion, ice, and extended periods of sunlight on fate and toxicity of constituents will need to be more fully understood due to environmental concerns and production costs. The fate of discharged produced water is determined by dilution and mixing, volatilization/dissolution/sedimentation, and biochemical/chemical reactions. These transport/transformation mechanisms are not well characterized in cold environments. Low temperature and motion may affect efficiency of separation equipment and reduce natural biodegradation and evaporation. As a result, the type of constituents targeted in warmer climates may not be a concern in cold regions and may be replaced by other constituents. The first part of this paper will identify chemicals of concern in produced water for cold regions and model their fate in the environment. Due to the low temperatures, many of the contaminant transformations will be governed by equilibrium. Identification of the chemicals of concern leads into the second theme of this paper. Oil and grease is monitored for regulatory purposes however, what is defined as " oil and grease?? depends on analytical/sampling methods which vary between regions. For instance, some methods measure both the dispersed and the dissolved hydrocarbons, so measurements of dispersed oil tend to be " overestimated?? when compared against limits. Comparison of analytical data between platforms or building of annual trends is also complicated. Discrete sampling, when the sample analysis is done onshore, delays mitigation or corrective actions with respect to process control and does not give an accurate temporal trend in oil in water discharge. Using the information from the " identification and fate?? section of this work we have been developing molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for highly selective isolation, detection and measurement of key constituents (e.g. alkylphenols) and are working toward devices to house the MIPs for online analysis. The development of these systems will allow the non-specialist to quickly identify constituents in the field and enable extensive data collection in real time and hence the knowledge to make informed and timely decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207