Glutamate Does Not Mediate Acute Neuronal Damage after Spreading Depression Induced by O <sub>2</sub> /Glucose Deprivation in the Hippocampal Slice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study argues that, in contrast to accepted excitotoxicity theory, O2/glucose deprivation damages neurons acutely by eliciting ischemic spreading depression (SD), a process not blocked by glutamate antagonists. In live rat hippocampal slices, the initiation, propagation, and resolution of SD can be imaged by monitoring wide-band changes in light transmittance (i.e., intrinsic optical signals). Oxygen/glucose deprivation for 10 minutes at 37.5 degrees C evokes a propagating wave of elevated light transmittance across the slice, representing the SD front. Within minutes, CA1 neurons in regions undergoing SD display irreversible damage in the form of field potential inactivation, swollen cell bodies, and extensively beaded dendrites, the latter revealed by single-cell injection of lucifer yellow. Importantly, glutamate receptor antagonists do not block SD induced by O2/glucose deprivation, nor do they prevent the resultant dendritic beading of CA1 neurons. However, CA1 neurons are spared if SD is suppressed by reducing the temperature to 35 degrees C during O2/glucose deprivation. This supports previous electrophysiologic evidence in vivo that SD during ischemia promotes acute neuronal damage and that glutamate antagonists are not protective of the metabolically stressed tissue. The authors propose that the inhibition of ischemic SD should be targeted as an important therapeutic strategy against stroke damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".