Computational study of substituent effects on gas-phase stabilities of Meisenheimer complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The total stabilization energies (TSEs) and anion stabilization energies (ASEs) of ring-substituted (X-) Meisenheimer complexes featuring two NO2 groups in the ring were determined using appropriate isodesmic reactions. The structures and energies of respective species were calculated at the B3LYP/6–311+G(2d,p) level of theory. Ten series of substituent effects were examined by varying substituent Y, which is connected to the sp3 carbon of the ring. The substituent effects were successfully analyzed using an extended Yukawa–Tsuno equation, [Formula: see text]. The r− values for the TSEs were identical to those for the ASEs, whereas the s values for the TSEs were significantly different from those for the ASEs. This shows that the effect of neutral species contributes to the s values of the TSEs. The r− and s values for the ASEs of all Meisenheimer complexes were distributed in a narrow range because substituent Y was insulated from the π-conjugation system. The r− values were large and the s values were small. This shows that the r− and s values were independent of each other and that the extended three-term Yukawa–Tsuno equation was intrinsic for substituent-effect analyses of anions. Although the variation was not substantial, the change in the r− values was clearly explained by the orbital interaction between substituent Y and the π-conjugation system. The r− values exhibited a good correlation with the bond lengths between the ring and the 4-NO2 group among all Meisenheimer complexes and benzylic anions. These facts provide a physical meaning: the r− value is a parameter that reveals the degree of the additional π interactions between the electron-withdrawing substituents and the π-conjugation systems of the ring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".