Electrochemically-assisted deposition of oxidases on platinum nanoparticle/multi-walled carbon nanotube-modified electrodes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Platinum nanoparticles were electrodeposited by a multi-potential step technique onto a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) film pre-casted on a glassy carbon (GC) or boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode. The MWCNT network consisted of Pt nanoparticles with an average diameter of 120 nm after an optimization of 36 deposition cycles. The resulting electrochemical sensors were capable of detecting hydrogen peroxide as low as 25 nM. Five different enzymes: glucose, lactate, glutamate, amino acid and xanthine oxidases, respectively, were deposited by a constant current technique for 5-10 min to form a stable and active biolayer for the analysis of their corresponding analytes. The glucose oxidase-based biosensor was linear up to 10 mM glucose with a detection limit of 250 nM and a response time of 5 s. Similar response times and detection limits were observed with glutamate, lactate, and amino acid oxidase despite the fact that the linear ranges were noticeably narrower. The mechanism of deposition was attributed to the decrease of local pH, created by oxygen evolution and effected enzyme precipitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it