MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016110891 · doi:10.1063/1.2195775

Deep energy levels in RuO2∕4H–SiC Schottky barrier structures

2006· article· en· W2016110891 on OpenAlexaff
Ł. Stuchlíková, D. Búc, L. Harmatha, Ulf Helmersson, Wen-Hsin Chang, I. Bello

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchottky diodeSchottky barrierMaterials scienceDeep-level transient spectroscopyMetal–semiconductor junctionOptoelectronicsWide-bandgap semiconductorThermal conductionActivation energySchottky effectElectrical resistivity and conductivityDiodeCondensed matter physicsSiliconChemistryElectrical engineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RuO 2 ∕ 4 H – SiC Schottky diode structures based on n-type 4H–SiC (7×1017cm−3) with stoichiometric RuO2 Schottky contacts were characterized by electrical capacitance-voltage and current voltage methods and deep-level transient spectroscopy in order to determine their unique semiconducting and electronic properties. The RuO2 films exhibited electrical conductivity of 60μΩcm for Schottky barrier heights of approximately 0.88eV. These Schottky structures revealed two deep energy levels with thermal activation energies of 0.56 and 0.85eV with reference to the conduction band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207