Effects of gold nanoparticle film morphology on the alignment of a nematic liquid crystal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the alignment of liquid crystal (LC) 4-cyano-4ʹ-pentylbiphenyl (5CB) to well-defined films of alkanethiol-capped gold nanoparticles, residing at the LC/water interface and in optical sandwich cell configurations. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of two core sizes (2.6 and 4.1 nm) were synthesised with a variety of alkyl chain lengths (CnH2n+1SH, for n = 5–18). Langmuir films of the nanoparticles were compressed to 10 mN/m and introduced to the LC/water interface via Langmuir–Schaefer transfer onto an ~20 μm thick film of LC. The 4.1 nm AuNP films consistently yield homeotropic alignment of the LC while the 2.6 nm AuNP films yield mixed alignments. These observations reflect differences in the AuNP film morphology, surface coverage and relatively weak anchoring strength of 5CB to the nanoparticle films. We determine the anchoring of 5CB to these alkanethiol-capped AuNP films at high coverage. This method can be applied to other types of nanoparticles and ligand shells for determining the LC anchoring to condensed films of water-insoluble nanoparticles with the goal of controlling nanoparticle–LC interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it