LiNaSiB<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7</sub>(OH) – novel structure of the new borosilicate mineral jadarite determined from laboratory powder diffraction data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure of a new mineral jadarite, LiNaSiB(3)O(7)(OH) (IMA mineral 2006-36), has been determined by simulated annealing and Rietveld refinement of laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data. The structure contains a layer of corner-sharing, tetrahedrally coordinated Li, Si and B forming an unbranched vierer single layer, which is decorated with triangular BO(3) groups. The Na ion is situated between the tetrahedral layers in a distorted octahedral site. As the very high boron content in this mineral makes obtaining neutron diffraction data very problematic, ab initio optimization using VASP was used to validate the structure and to better localize the H atom. The H atom is located on the apex of the triangular BO(3) group and is involved in a weak intralayer hydrogen bond. The final Rietveld refinement agrees with the ab initio optimization with regard to a hydrogen bond between the H atom and one of the tetrahedral corner O atoms. The refined structure seems to be of a remarkably high quality given the complexity of the structure, the high proportion of very light elements and the fact that it was determined from relatively low-resolution laboratory data over a limited 2theta range (10-90 degrees 2theta).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it