O2-S6.02 Occupational and intimate partner violence and inconsistent condom use with clients among female sex workers in southern India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Global reports suggest that interpersonal violence experienced by female sex workers (FSWs), including occupational violence (eg, by clients, CLViol) and intimate partner violence (IPViol) may be important structural determinants of vulnerability to HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study characterised the type and frequency of CLViol and IPViol experienced by FSWs in southern India and examined the relationship between client violence and inconsistent condom use (ICU) with clients. Methods Data were analysed from cross-sectional surveys of FSWs in three districts in Karnataka state (2007). ICU was defined as condom use frequency reported as 'never/sometimes/often' vs ‘always’, by repeat and occasional clients. CLViol and IPViol measures included having experienced physical violence in the past 6 months (ie, hurt, hit, kicked, punched, choked, burned) or sexual violence in the past year (ie, beaten or otherwise physically forced to have sexual intercourse). Results Of our sample of 1245 FSWs, ICU was 13.0% with occasional and 20.2% with repeat clients. Overall, 13.1% of women reported physical violence from any perpetrator (CLViol: 5.5%; IPViol: 4.6%) and 9.7% reported sexual violence (CLViol: 5.2%; IPViol: 4.4%). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of ICU with occasional clients were significantly higher for women who had experienced physical CLViol (adjusted OR (AOR): 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2% to 4.8%) or sexual CLViol (AOR: 2.7, 95%CI: 1.3% to 5.5%). Similar results were found with repeat clients: AOR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4% to 4.6% and AOR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3% to 4.2%, for physical and sexual violence respectively. A dose-response relationship between the number of times experiencing CLViol and increased ICU with both types of clients was also observed (p<0.001) (Abstract O2-S6.02 figure 1). IPViol was not significantly associated with ICU with clients. Experiencing CLViol was not associated with experiencing IPViol (p=0.321). Abstract O2-S6.02 Figure 1 Proportion of female sex workers who used condoms inconsistently with occasional or repeat clients according to the number of times they experienced physical violence by clients in the last 6 months (did not experience, experienced one time, experienced 2-5 times, experienced 6+ times). Discussion A strong independent relationship between experiencing client violence and inconsistent condom use with clients among FSWs in southern India was observed, highlighting FSWs' vulnerability to HIV/STI infection. Occupational violence against FSWs should be addressed within HIV/STI prevention programming. Structural-legal reforms to current sex work laws and safer-environment interventions should be developed to reduce violence and HIV/STI vulnerability among FSWs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".