Interrogation of the Active Sites of Protein Arginine Deiminases (PAD1, -2, and -4) Using Designer Probes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein arginine deiminases (PADs) are involved in a number of cellular pathways, and they catalyze the transformation of peptidyl arginine residue into a citrulline as part of post-translational modifications. To understand ligand preferences, a group of probe molecules were investigated against PAD1, PAD2, and PAD4. These probe molecules carried a well-known covalent modifier of the catalytic cysteine residue, 2-chloroacetamidine moiety, which was tethered to an α-amino acid via a carbon linker. The chain length for the linker varied from 0 to 4. Time-dependent assays indicated that 2-chloroacetamidine (2CA) with no linker inhibited all PAD enzymes with a similar trend in the second-order rate constants, although with poor affinity. Among the other three probe molecules, compound 3 with a three-carbon linker exhibited the best second-order rate constants for optimal ligand reactivity with the binding site. These analyses provide insights into the relative patterns of covalent inactivation of PAD isozymes and the design of novel inhibitors targeting PAD enzymes as potential therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".