MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016342334 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v6n2p34

Preparation, Characterization and Voltammetric Aspects of a Silsesquioxane Organofunctionalized With Imidazole Groups and Subsequent Reaction With Silver and Potassium Hexacyanoferrate (III)

2014· article· en· W2016342334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tayla Fernanda Serantoni da Silveira, Maiara de Souza Magossi, Mariana de Souza Magossi, Urquisa de Oliveira Bicalho, Devaney Ribeiro do Carmo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRedoxCyclic voltammetryImidazoleFourier transform infrared spectroscopyElectrochemistrySilsesquioxaneInorganic chemistryGraphiteInfrared spectroscopyPotassiumNuclear chemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the interaction of a octa (3-chloropropyl)octasilsesquioxane (SS) functionalized with imidazole (SSI) groups, and its subsequent reaction with silver (AgSSI) and hexacyanoferrate (III) (AgHSSI). The materials SS, SSI were characterized by infrared (FTIR); solid state 13C and 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The AgSSI and AgHSSI were characterized by electronic (Uv-Vis) and infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The AgHSSI was incorporated into a graphite paste electrode and the electrochemical studies were conducted with cyclic voltammetry. The AgSSI system was studied first, followed by the AgHSSI. The spectroscopic studies reveals that preparation was conducted with success. The cyclic voltammogram of AgSSI obtained from a graphite paste electrode modified (50% m/m) exhibited a redox couple with average potential (E?’) of 0.01 V (vs Ag/AgCl(s), KNO3, 1.0 mol L-1; v = 20 mV s-1), attributed to the Ag0/Ag+ redox process. The cyclic voltammogram of AgHSSI with AgHSSI (50% m/m) exhibited a single redox couple, much wider with E?’= 0.14 V, (vs Ag/AgCl(s), KNO3, 1.0 mol L-1, v = 20 mV s-1) attributed to the Fe2+(CN)6/ Fe3+(CN)6 process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicSilicone and Siloxane ChemistryFrench-language works237,207