Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fifth conference with the title The Arithmetic of Fields , organized by Wulf-Dieter Geyer (Erlangen), Moshe Jarden (Tel Aviv), and Florian Pop (Philadelphia), was held February 5–11th, 2006. In contrast to the fourth conference held in February 3–9th, 2002, this conference was a “full” one, namely as many participants were invited as the Institute could host. Due to support from the European Union, more young people were invited in the last few weeks prior to the conference, so that the total number of participants reached 54. The participants came from 13 countries: Germany (20), USA (10), Israel (7), France (7), Denmark (2), Austria (1), Brazil (1), Canada (1), Hungary (1), Japan (1), Romania (1), Russia (1), and South Africa (1). Among the participants there were 9 graduate students and 8 young researchers. Six women attended the conference. The organisers asked four people before the conference to give surveys of one hour on recent progress made by other colleagues in Field Arithmetic. Tamás Szamuely (Budapest) reported on the solution by János Kollár of a Problem due to Ax from 1968: Every PAC field of characteristic 0 is C_1 . The case where the characteristic is positive remains open. Alexandra Shlapentokh (Greenville) described the progress Bjorn Poonen made on Hilbert's Tenth Problem: There exists a recursive set T_1 of prime numbers of natural density 0 and a set T_2 of prime numbers of natural density 1 such that T_1\subseteq T_2 and for each set S with T_1\subseteq S\subseteq T_2 Hilbert's Tenth Problem for O_{\mathbb Q,S} has a negative solution. Here O_{\mathbb Q,S} is the ring of all rational numbers whose denominators are divided only by primes in S . Whether Hilbert's Tenth Problem for \mathbb Q has a negative solution is still open. Alexander Prestel (Konstanz) presented a theorem of Jochen Koenigsmann: If a p -Sylow extension P of a field K is Henselian and P is neither separably closed nor real closed, then K itself is Henselian. Pierre Débes (Lille) surveyed Fried's problem on Modular Towers. He mentioned that the main conjecture is close to completion in the case of 4 branch points (Bayley–Fried). He also reported on a result of Anna Cadoret: The dihedral group has a regular realization over \mathbb Q_{\rm ab} with only inertia groups of order 2 . In addition to these survey talks seventeen participants were invited to report on their own achievements in 45 minutes talks. Altogether, the talks presented the impressive progress made in Field Arithmetic in recent years. The reader may find here extended abstracts of all talks. We hope they will be to the benefit of all of the participants as well as the fans of Field Arithmetic. The organisers: Wulf-Dieter Geyer, Moshe Jarden, Florian Pop
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".