Immunological reconstitution after hematopoietic cell transplantation – its relation to the contents of the graft
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), there is a prolonged period of immune deficiency. OBJECTIVE: To review the recovery of immunity after HCT, including how it is influenced by the cellular contents of the graft, and therapeutic implications. METHODS: Literature review using Medline. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Whereas innate immunity (e.g., epithelial barriers, phagocytes, natural killer cells) typically recovers within weeks post-transplant, the recovery of adaptive immunity takes longer, months for B cells and years for T cells. The recovery is influenced by the graft contents. For example the number of CD34 cells given with the graft affects the tempo of neutrophil recovery, and the number of CD4 T cells given with the graft affects CD4 T cell counts post-transplant. Improved understanding of the relationship between graft contents and immune reconstitution could lead to graft engineering improving transplant outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".