Synthesis and Properties of Carborane-Containing Dendronized Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carborane-containing dendronized polymers were successfully synthesized using two different approaches up to the fourth generation. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) was effective for the polymerization of carborane-functionalized styrenic monomers, leading to well-defined polymers with high boron content and narrow molecular weight distributions (PDI < 1.1). The resulting carborane-functionalized polymers could then be dendronized using a divergent approach to introduce aliphatic polyester dendrons of generation 1−4 grafted from the polymer backbone. This first approach afforded a maximum degree of dendronization of 70%. To increase the degree of dendronization, a first-generation macromonomer was polymerized using NMP to yield a fully functionalized first-generation dendronized polymer. This material was also dendronized up to the fourth generation. Both approaches produced water-soluble dendronized polymers (1 mg/mL in pure water) with high molecular weights (in excess of 70 kDa). It was found that the solubility of the polymer produced from the second approach, where dendronization occurred at every monomer unit, exceeded that of the first approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".