L’éducation à la sexualité des aînés : éléments de sexogérontagogie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte a pour objectif de présenter les principes de base sur lesquels pourrait se fonder la sexogérontagogie et autour desquels l’éducation à la sexualité des aînés pourrait se développer. Des concepts clés comme la pensée postformelle et la réalisation de soi témoigneraient des manifestations cognitives et affectives qui devraient se produire chez les personnes âgées inscrites dans cette démarche éducative. Il s’agit d’inviter l’étudiant âgé à s’engager sur la voie de la sagesse que recherche un bon nombre d’aînés, sans pour cela exclure la passion. The goal of the text is to present the basis on which sexogerontagogy may be founded and around which the education of the sexuality of elders may develop. Key concepts such as postformal thoughts and self-accomplishment bear witness to cognitive and emotional manifestations that should occur among the elders inscribed in this educational approach. It consists of inviting the elderly student to embark on the path of wisdom that many elders are searching for, without excluding passion in the process. El texto tiene como objetivo presentar los principios de base sobre los cuales podría fundarse la sexogerontogogía y alrededor de los cuales la educación a la sexualidad de los mayores podría desarrollarse. Conceptos clave como el pensamiento postformal y la autorrealización testificarían de las manifestaciones cognitivas y afectivas que deberían producirse en las personas mayores inscritas en esta gestión educativa. Se trata de invitar al estudiante de edad avanzada a comprometerse en la vía de la sabiduría que busca un buen número de éstos mayores, sin que eso tenga porque excluir la pasión.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".