Restricted feeding improves postischemic recovery of Langendorff-perfused rat hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to assess the effects of a restricted feeding schedule (RFS) on postischemic contractile recovery in relation to triacylglycerol (TAG), glycogen, and ATP content. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) activity, reduced/oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH/GSSG), and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels were also determined. Isolated rat hearts entrained to daily RFS (2 h food access starting at 1200) or fed ad libitum (FED) for 3 weeks were Langendorff-perfused (25 min ischemia, 30 min reperfusion) with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution (10 mmol/L glucose). RFS improved the recovery of contractility and reduced creatine kinase (CK) release upon reperfusion. Further, at the end of reperfusion, RFS hearts exhibited increased G6PDH activity and repletion of tissue glycogen, TAG, and ATP that was not observed in the FED hearts. GSH/GSSG at the end of reperfusion fell to the same value in both nutritional states, and TBARS levels were higher in the RFS hearts. In conclusion, RFS improved postischemic functional recovery, which was accompanied by a reduction in CK release and a striking energy recovery. Although enhanced G6PDH activity was displayed, RFS was unable to reduce lipid peroxidation, supporting a clear dissociation between protection against mechanical dysfunction and CK release on the one hand and oxidative damage on the other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".