MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2016516848 · doi:10.1121/1.4788538

Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli using three oscillator placements in premature infants

2005· article· en· W2016516848 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer L. Hatton, Susan A. Small, David R. Stapells

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeheadBone conductionAudiogramAudiologyMedicineHearing lossSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Auditory Steady State Responses (ASSRs) are a promising technique for estimating the behavioral audiogram in infants. The current study investigates the effects of bone-oscillator placement on ASSR thresholds in premature infants (N=15, mean age: 35 weeks PCA). Using the MASTER research system, ASSR thresholds to multiple bone-conduction tones (0–50 dBHL re:mastoid; 77–101 Hz) presented to the (i) superior-posterior temporal bone, (ii) mastoid, and (iii) forehead were obtained. Results with no response at 50 dBHL were arbitrarily assigned a threshold of 60 dBHL. No differences in threshold were found between the temporal and mastoid placements. Thresholds averaged across these placements were 17, 15, 34, and 30 dBHL for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. However, on average, thresholds for the forehead placement were significantly higher by at least 14, 11, 18, and 14 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively, compared to the temporal and mastoid placements. These differences may be even greater because absent responses at the maximum intensity were seen more often with forehead placement compared to other placements. In conclusion, one may use either the temporal bone or mastoid for bone-oscillator placement, but the forehead should be avoided. [Work supported by CIHR and NSERC-Canada.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→