Direct visualization of the genomic distribution and organization of two cervid centromeric satellite DNA families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several repetitive DNA fragments were generated from PCR amplifications of caribou DNA using primer sequences derived from the white-tailed deer satellite II DNA clone OvDII. Two fragments, designated Rt-0.5 and Rt-0.7, were sequenced and found to have 96% sequence similarity. These caribou clones also had 85% sequence similarity with OvDII. Multiple-colored fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies with satellite I and satellite II DNA probes to caribou metaphase chromosomes and extended chromatin fibers provided direct visualization of the genomic organization of these two satellite DNA families, with the following findings: (1) Cervid satellite I DNA is confined to the centromeric regions of the acrocentric autosomes, whereas satellite II DNA is found at the centromeric regions of all chromosomes except for the Y. (2) For most acrocentric chromosomes, the satellite I signal appeared to be medially located at the primary constriction, in contrast to that of satellite II, which appeared to be oriented toward the lateral sides as two separate fluorescent dots. (3) The satellite II clone Rt-0.7 appeared to be enriched in the centromeric region of the caribou X chromosome, a pair of biarmed autosomes, and a number of other acrocentric autosomes. (4) Fiber-FISH demonstrated that the satellite I and satellite II arrays were juxtaposed. On highly extended chromatin fibers, the total length of the hybridization signals for the two satellite DNA arrays often reached 300-400 microm. The length of a given satellite II array usually reached 200 microm, corresponding to 2 x 10(3) kb of DNA in a given centromere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".