MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016582872 · doi:10.1186/ar4666

Eculizumab in recalcitrant antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

2014· article· en· W2016582872 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ekaterini Zapantis, Richard Furie, Diane Horowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Research & Therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthLupus Research AllianceCanadian Arthritis NetworkNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesArthritis SocietyCentral New York Community FoundationMerck KGaALupus Foundation of America
KeywordsEculizumabMedicineRheumatologyAntiphospholipid syndromeInternal medicineAntibodyHematologyImmunologyComplement system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined as the occurrence of venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity, in the presence of serological evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies (including IgM and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies, IgM and IgG anti-β 2 -glyoprotein I antibodies, or the lupus anticoagulant). Whereas most patients with focal thrombotic events respond to anticoagulation, occasional patients are refractory to standard therapeutic interventions and continue to have either focal or multifocal occlusive disease. For those with recalcitrant disease or those with the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), physicians resort to the addition of antiplatelet agents, steroids, immunosuppressives, IVIG, rituximab, or plasma exchange. Complement inhibition may be an effective way to prevent thrombosis associated with APS. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to complement protein C5 and prevents the conversion of C5 to C5a and C5b, may potentially be an effective treatment for patients with APS. First studied in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatomyositis, and idiopathic membranous nephropathy in the early 2000s, development of the drug for rheumatic diseases was abandoned in favor of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Given the experience of complement inhibition in animal models of APS as well as prior use of eculizumab several years ago in one of our refractory APS patients, we administered eculizumab to two patients with severe refractory APS. Two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, unresponsive to conventional anticoagulant therapy, were treated with a loading dose of eculizumab followed by dosing every other week (atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome dosing schedule). It has been suggested that the platelet count may be used as a surrogate marker of APS activity. During therapy, both patients' platelet counts were monitored and any new thrombotic events documented. At the time of submission of this abstract, both patients are continuing treatment with eculizumab. At their lowest values, the patients had platelet counts of 35,000 and 22,000 (K/ml). One of the patients was steroid dependent in order to maintain her platelet count. After initiation of eculizumab, the patient was able to taper steroids as the platelet count has risen from a low of 35,000 to average counts of 100,000. The second patient's platelet count rose to over 200,000 from 22,000 within 10 days of receipt of eculizumab. For both patients the increases in platelet counts have been sustained other than during brief periods when therapy was delayed. During the treatment period (4 and 8 months), there were no new thrombotic events. See Figure 1 . APS patients treated with eculizumab: platelet counts . Eculizumab has shown promising results in our patients with refractory antiphospholipid syndrome. Longer follow-up of these patients will be needed in order to discern the effect on thrombosis. Controlled studies are needed to further assess the efficacy of eculizumab in this condition, as are mechanistic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Research & TherapySame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207