MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016584979 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00901.2003

Vasodilator effect and mechanism of action of vascular endothelial growth factor in skin vasculature

2004· article· en· W2016584979 on OpenAlexaff
Homa Ashrafpour, Ning Huang, Peter C. Neligan, Christopher R. Forrest, Patrick Addison, Michael A. Moses, Ronald H. Levine, Cho Y. Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasodilationVascular endothelial growth factorAgonistPerfusionAngiogenesisMedicinePharmacologyReceptorEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicineVEGF receptors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various laboratories have reported that local subcutaneous or subdermal injection of VEGF(165) at the time of surgery effectively attenuated ischemic necrosis in rat skin flaps, but the mechanism was not studied and enhanced angiogenesis was implicated. In the present study, we used the clinically relevant isolated perfused 6 x 16-cm pig buttock skin flap model to 1) test our hypothesis that VEGF(165) is a potent vasodilator and acute VEGF(165) treatment increases skin perfusion; and 2) investigate the mechanism of VEGF(165)-induced skin vasorelaxation. We observed that VEGF(165) (5 x 10(-16)-5 x 10(-11) M) elicited a concentration-dependent decrease in perfusion pressure (i.e., vasorelaxation) in skin flaps preconstricted with a submaximal concentration of norepinephrine (NE), endothelin-1, or U-46619. The VEGF(165)-induced skin vasorelaxation was confirmed using a dermofluorometry technique for assessment of skin perfusion. The vasorelaxation potency of VEGF(165) in NE-preconstricted skin flaps (pD(2) = 13.57 +/- 0.31) was higher (P < 0.05) than that of acetylcholine (pD(2) = 7.08 +/- 0.24). Human placental factor, a specific VEGF receptor-1 agonist, did not elicit any vasorelaxation effect. However, a specific antibody to VEGF receptor-2 (1 microg/ml) or a specific VEGF receptor-2 inhibitor (5 x 10(-6) M SU-1498) blocked the vasorelaxation effect of VEGF(165) in NE-preconstricted skin flaps. These observations indicate that the potent vasorelaxation effect of VEGF(165) in the skin vasculature is initiated by the activation of VEGF receptor-2. Furthermore, using pharmacological probes, we observed that the postreceptor signaling pathways of VEGF(165)-induced skin vasorelaxation involved activation of phospholipase C and protein kinase C, an increase in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate activity, release of the intra-cellular Ca(2+) store, and synthesis/release of endothelial nitric oxide, which predominantly triggered the effector mechanism of VEGF(165)-induced vasorelaxation. This information provides, for the first time, an important insight into the mechanism of VEGF(165) protein or gene therapy in the prevention/treatment of ischemia in skin flap surgery and skin ischemic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207