P-306 - Adolescent day treatment program: outcomes and follow-up study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose The Adolescent Day Treatment Program (ADTP) established in Summer 2000 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada provides multi-disciplinary non-residential day treatment for mentally disturbed youth aged 13 to 18 years who suffer from moderate to severe forms of mental health disorders that do not to require hospitalization or as a step-down from hospitalization. The treatment approach includes pharmaco-therapy, psychiatric consultation, psycho-educational groups, individual, group and family therapy, occupational and recreational therapy and school board-operated educational programming. Methods Data descriptions and repeated measure analyses included variables representing demographics, length of stay, diagnoses, admission and discharge problem severity, goal achievement ratings, and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Results Significant improvement was observed over the course of treatment in the majority of patients in outcome measures (problem severity and goal achievement) and CGAS. Follow-up of a sub-sample of those served indicates that function at the time of discharge best predicts adaptation at the time of follow-up. Discussion Day treatment appears to be effective and clinical effects persists at the time of follow-up and are predicted primarily by discharge function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".