MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016617138 · doi:10.2174/1381612033392486

Role of Cytokines in Chlamydia trachomatis Protective Immunity and Immunopathology

2003· review· en· W2016617138 on OpenAlexaff
Xi Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pharmaceutical Design · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyImmune systemChlamydia trachomatisChlamydiaImmunityBiologyCytokineImmunopathologyAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diseases caused by Chlamydia trachomatis infection and its sequelae represent major public health concerns worldwide. In order to rationally develop an effective vaccine to chlamydial infection, we need a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the protective and pathological immune responses to chlamydial antigens. Recent studies in chlamydial immunobiology have demonstrated a close link between cytokine production patterns and the type of immune responses to this pathogen. In particular, IL-10 has been found to be associated with susceptibility to chlamydial infection and the typical pathological changes caused by the infection such as granuloma formation and fibrosis. Although Th1 type delayed hypersensitivity (DTH) is associated with protective immunity, the Th2 type DTH documented in interferon (IFN)-gamma gene knockout (KO) mice fails to control chlamydial infection. The Th2 type DTH is characterized by eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration and is associated with high levels of IL-4 and IL-5 production. The capability of dendritic cell (DC) in initiating T cell response to Chlamydia has been shown in studies using cultured DCs and a DC line. Further studies should be performed to elucidate the role played by DCs in natural chlamydial infection and the potential involvement of DC subsets in directing immune responses to chlamydial infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Pharmaceutical DesignSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207