MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016638273 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201302294

Molecular Engineering of “Click”‐Phospholes Towards Self‐Assembled Luminescent Soft Materials

2013· article· en· W2016638273 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoming He, Jian‐Bin Lin, Wang Hay Kan, Pengcheng Dong, Simon Trudel, Thomas Baumgartner

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMaterials scienceIntermolecular forceLuminescenceSelf-assemblyMoleculeAmphiphileNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryChemistryCopolymerPolymerOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the self‐assembled bilayer structures of natural amphiphilic phospholipids, a new class of highly luminescent “click”‐phospholes with exocyclic alkynyl group at the phosphorus center is reported. These molecules can be easily functionalized with a self‐assembly group to generate neutral “phosphole‐lipids”. This novel approach retains the versatile reactivity of the phosphorus center, allowing further engineering of the photophysical and self‐assembly properties of the materials at a molecular level. The results of this study highlight the importance of being able to balance weak intermolecular interactions for controlling the self‐assembly properties of soft materials. Only molecules with the appropriate set of intermolecular arrangement/interactions show both organogel and liquid crystal mesophases with well‐ordered microstructures. Moreover, an efficient energy transfer of the luminescent materials is demonstrated and applied in the detection of organic solvent vapors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207