N-Terminal Proteolysis of Full-Length Mutant Huntingtin in an Inducible PC12 Cell Model of Huntington’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteolytic cleavage of mutant huntingtin may play a key role in the pathogenesis of Huntington's disease; however the steps in huntingtin proteolysis are not fully understood. Huntingtin was shown to be cleaved by caspases and calpains within a region between 460-600 amino acids from the N-terminus. Two smaller N-terminal fragments produced by unknown protease have been previously described as cp-A and cp-B. To further investigate the huntingtin proteolytic pathway, we used an inducible PC12 cell model expressing full-length huntingtin with either normal or expanded polyglutamine. This cell model recapitulates several steps of huntingtin proteolysis: proteolysis mediated by caspases within the region previously mapped for caspase cleavage, and cleavage generating two novel N-terminal fragments (cp-1 approximately 90-105 residues long and cp-2 extending beyond 115-129 epitope of huntingtin). Interestingly, the deletion of amino acids 105-114 (mapped previously as a cleavage site for cp-A) failed to affect the production of cp-1 or cp-2. Therefore, we conclude that these new fragments are distinct from previously described cp-A and cp-B. We demonstrate that cp-1 and cp-2 fragments are produced and accumulate within nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusions prior to huntingtin-induced cell toxicity, and these fragments can be formed by caspase-independent proteolytic cleavage of huntingtin in PC12 cells. In addition, inhibition of calpains leads to decreased subsequent degradation of cp-1 and cp-2 fragments, and accelerated formation of inclusions. Further delineation of huntingtin cleavage events may lead to novel therapeutic targets for HD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".