Morphometric Parameters of the Calabar River Basin: Implication for Hydrologic Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study examined the morphometric parameters of the Calabar River Basin with emphasis on its implicationfor hydrologic processes. Data for this study were obtained from topographic map which were subject to fieldconfirmation. The result revealed that the basin area was 1 514km2. There were 223 streams with a total streamlength of 516.34km. The textural dissection was considered to be low as drainage density, stream frequency anddrainage intensity values were 0.34km-1, 0.15km-1 and 0.05 respectively. The basin was found to be stronglyelongated with circularity ratio of 0.34 and elongation ratio of 0.64. The average bifurcation ratio was 2.83. Thevery low value of drainage intensity implies that drainage density and stream frequency have very little effect onthe extent to which the surface has been lowered by agents of denudation. These low values of drainage density,stream frequency and drainage intensity also imply that surface runoff is not quickly removed from the basin,making it susceptible to flooding, gully erosion and landslides, particularly in the lower part of the basin. It istherefore recommended that human activities that could impact negatively on stream network in the basin shouldbe discouraged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".