MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016768966 · doi:10.1021/es0488941

UV Photolytic Mechanism of <i>N</i>-Nitrosodimethylamine in Water:  Dual Pathways to Methylamine versus Dimethylamine

2005· article· en· W2016768966 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Changha Lee, Wonyong Choi, Young Gyu Kim, Jeyong Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario
KeywordsDimethylamineChemistryN-NitrosodimethylaminePhotodissociationMethylaminePhotochemistryNitriteAqueous solutionCarcinogenNitrateOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The direct ultraviolet (UV) photolysis of N-nitrosodimethyl-amine (NDMA), a well-known potential carcinogen, was investigated in aqueous solution with its degradation products analyzed quantitatively. NDMA is known to be photolyzed either to dimethylamine (DMA) or to methylamine (MA) by two distinct pathways. However, the mechanism through which NDMA is photolyzed to DMA is still not clearly understood. This study reveals a new mechanistic pathway of NDMA photolysis to DMA by identifying the factors influencing the photolysis pathway. The two pathways of NDMA photolysis were found to be strongly dependent on the initial NDMA concentration and solution pH. Increasing the initial NDMA concentration clearly favored the DMA formation path. DMA production was optimized in the region of pH 4-5. The nitrite ion (NO2-) produced from the NDMA photolysis was identified as a key reagent in directing the NDMA photolysis toward DMA production. The observed photolytic behaviors of NDMA photolysis could be successfully explained in terms of the new mechanism involving the role of NO2-.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207