Spatulated end‐to‐end bile duct reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biliary complications continue to be a major source of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and management of biliary complications related to the technique of bile duct reconstruction. The patients were stratified into two groups: group I (n = 39) had bile duct reconstruction performed by an end-to-end single interrupted suture choledochocholedochostomy (EE-CDCD) and group II (n = 38) had a spatulated end-to-end CDCD (spEE-CDCD) reconstruction; both groups had an intraductal stent. The groups were similar in age, gender, liver transplant indications and Pugh score. Ten biliary complications (26%), including five bile leaks (13%) and five biliary strictures (13%), were observed in the EE-CDCD group, while one biliary stricture (2.6%) occurred in the spEE-CDCD group (p < 0.05). Subsequent imaging studies and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were performed less often in patients undergoing spEE-CDCD reconstruction (p < 0.05). The technique of a spatulated end-to-end bile duct reconstruction provides a significant improvement in lowering biliary complication rates in liver transplant patients. Despite the modest number of cases in this study this technique shows promise and has become the technique of choice in our institution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".