MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016846565 · doi:10.1029/2000jc000504

Observations and linear analysis of sill‐generated internal tides and estuarine flow in Haro Strait

2002· article· en· W2016846565 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rich Pawlowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSillBarotropic fluidGeologyInternal tideBaroclinityOceanographyStratification (seeds)Current meterInternal waveGeostrophic windAmplitudeAdvectionBoundary currentGeophysicsOcean currentPetrologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current meter records from two sets of observations 20 years apart in Haro Strait, British Columbia, Canada, are analyzed. Haro Strait is a deep channel separated from larger bodies of water on either side by relatively shallow sills. The estuarine flow in this region is in approximate geostrophic balance and is apparently unaffected by the tidally driven spring/neap cycle in vertical stratification. Strong baroclinic variability with an amplitude 1 m s −1 (close to the amplitude of the barotropic tide) is present. A linear theory for internal tides in silled basins is developed using no‐bottom‐flow boundary conditions to represent sill effects. By comparison with observations it is concluded that an internal tide is generated at the seaward sill and propagates inshore. Although local damping appears to be weak, no return signal is found from the inshore sill, suggesting that either dissipation is strong in that area or that the internal tide is transmitted across that sill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207