MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016920631 · doi:10.1002/cncr.24375

Radiosensitivity translates into excellent local control in extremity myxoid liposarcoma

2009· article· en· W2016920631 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyxoid liposarcomaMedicineLiposarcomaSoft tissue sarcomaSarcomaSoft tissueRadiation therapyDemographicsCohortSurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Myxoid liposarcoma has been reported to be more radiosensitive compared with other soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The authors report the results of multidisciplinary treatment of extremity myxoid liposarcoma compared with a contemporary cohort of other STS subtypes with an emphasis on the role of radiotherapy (RT) in improving local control. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2004, 691 patients were identified from a prospective STS database who underwent combined management for localized extremity STS and were followed for a minimum of 12 months or until death. All patients underwent surgery together with pre or postoperative RT, depending on their presenting characteristics and resection margins. Demographics and outcomes were compared between patients with myxoid liposarcoma and other STS subtypes (other-STS). RESULTS: Of 691 patients, 88 patients had myxoid liposarcoma and 603 had other STS subtypes (other-STS). Median age was 48 and 60 years for the myxoid liposarcoma and other-STS groups, respectively. Median follow-up was 86 and 61 months, respectively. For myxoid liposarcoma and other-STS groups, preoperative RT was used in 57% versus 61% of patients and postoperative RT in 43% versus 39%, respectively. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 97.7% for patients with myxoid liposarcoma compared with 89.6% for patients with other-STS tumors (P = .008). High-grade tumors were present in 7% and 59% of myxoid liposarcoma and other-STS patients, respectively (P = .0003). Two myxoid liposarcoma patients with local recurrence had positive resection margins, whereas only 33% of patients in the other-STS group who developed a local recurrence had positive resection margins. No patients with myxoid liposarcoma required amputation as primary management, whereas 8 (1.3%) required amputation as primary management in the other-STS group. Systemic disease control was superior in myxoid liposarcoma compared with other-STS patients, with 5-year overall and metastasis-free survival rates of 93.9% versus 76.4% (P = .0008) and 89.1% versus 66.0% (P = .0001) respectively. Of 12 myxoid liposarcoma patients with distant metastases, 7 appeared in nonpulmonary sites. In comparison, 205 (34%) patients with other-STS tumors developed systemic disease but 78% had pulmonary metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary management of extremity STS achieves high rates of local control. Myxoid liposarcoma is associated with higher rates of local control compared with other STS subtypes, after combined surgery and radiation, suggesting a particular radiosensitivity that can be exploited to improve oncologic outcome in appropriate cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it