MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016940755 · doi:10.1080/09613210010001150

Curbing the growth in UK commercial energy consumption

2001· article· en· W2016940755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Research & Information · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsAlberta Conservation Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionEfficient energy useLegislationBusinessConsumption (sociology)Investment (military)ProductivityNatural resource economicsEconomicsPublic economicsEconomic growthEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rate of growth in UK commercial energy consumption since the early 1970s has been approximately three times greater than in the domestic sector. Consumption is projected to continue growing faster than in all other sectors except transport. Increasing floor space has been accompanied by rising energy intensity in many commercial buildings. In the office sector, demand for air conditioning has grown rapidly, and this is associated with a dramatic increase in CO2 emissions. Significant cost-effective CO2 savings have been identified in the sector, using readily available technologies. The Climate Change Levy, and questions of comfort, health and productivity among workers, are pushing energy issues up the agenda for many businesses. However positive action is impeded by barriers in the commercial property sector, such as conflicts of interest between landlords and tenants, poor information and professional conservatism. These barriers act to limit energy efficiency investment, to the detriment of building occupants and wider society for generations to come. These problems will limit the efficacy of existing initiatives that aim to curb commercial sector energy use. The Association for the Conservation of Energy considers that new legislation is needed. This would require freeholders to improve the energy efficiency of their new and existing buildings, in consultation with occupiers and/or unions. Further research is needed on options for sharing the costs and benefits with occupiers and/or energy service companies. Depuis le début des années 1970, le taux de croissance de la consommation énergétique commerciale au Royaume-Uni a étéprès de trois fois supérieure àcelui de la consommation du secteur domestique. Il devrait continuer à crôitre plus vite que dans tous les autres secteurs, à l'exception des transports. L'augmentation de la surface utile par personne s'est accompagnée d'un accroissement de l'intensité énergétique dans de nombreux bâtiments commerciaux. Dans le secteur des immeubles de bureaux, la demande en climatisation s'est accélérée et s'est donc traduite par une augmentation spectaculaire des émissions de CO2. Les technologies existantes permettent de lutter avec efficacité et à moindre coût contre ces émissions. Le problème des changements climatiques, ainsi que les questions de confort, d'hygiène et de productivité chez les travailleurs, mettent en avant les questions d'énergie dans de nombreuses entreprises. Or, des actions positives sont confrontées à des obstacles dans le secteur de la propriété commerciale; c'est le cas des conflits d'intérêts entre propriétaires et locataires, de la médiocrité de l'information et du conservatisme professionnel. Ces obstacles gênent les investissements axés sur une amélioration du rendement énergétique, au détriment des occupants des bâtiments et d'une plus grande sociétépour les générations àvenir. Ils iront àl'encontre des initiatives existantes dont l'objectif est de freiner la consommation de l'énergie dans le secteur commercial. L'Association pour la Conservation de l'Énergie estime que cette nouvelle législation est nécessaire. Il faudrait pour cela que les propriétaires fonciers améliorent l'efficacité énergétique de leurs bâtiments, anciens et nouveaux, en concertation avec les occupants et/ou leurs syndicats. Il faut conduire d'autres recherches sur les options concernant le partage des coûts et des bénéfices avec les occupants et (ou) avec les entreprises de services énergétiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it