MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016943168 · doi:10.1097/dad.0b013e3181af7dee

Composite Cutaneous Lymphoma in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Methotrexate

2010· article· en· W2016943168 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Huwait, Béatrice Wang, Chaim Shustik, René P. Michel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisLymphomaLymphoproliferative disordersMethotrexateRituximabImmunodeficiencyDermatologyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, whether treated or not with immunosuppressive agents including methotrexate, have an increased risk of lymphoproliferative disorders. Termed "iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders" in the 2008 World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms, they include Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Composite lymphomas are rare, particularly in skin, with none reported in immunodeficiency states. We report the case of a 67 year-old woman with a long history of rheumatoid arthritis, on methotrexate treatment, who developed multiple skin lesions exhibiting a malignant infiltrate displaying both B- and T-cell phenotypes and dual clonal gene rearrangement by polymerase chain reaction, consistent with a cutaneous composite lymphoma. The patient received chemotherapy including rituximab with partial response, but the T-cell component recurred. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a cutaneous composite lymphoma in a patient with an iatrogenic immunodeficiency representing a dual challenge, diagnostic for the pathologist and therapeutic for the hematologist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of DermatopathologySame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207