Networks underlying paroxysmal fast activity and slow spike and wave in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use EEG-fMRI to determine which structures are critically involved in the generation of paroxysmal fast activity (PFA) and slow spike and wave (SSW) (1.5-2.5 Hz), the characteristic interictal discharges of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). METHODS: We studied 13 well-characterized patients with LGS using structural imaging and EEG-fMRI at 3 tesla. Ten patients had cortical structural abnormalities. PFA and SSW were considered as separate events in the fMRI analysis. RESULTS: Simultaneous with fMRI, PFA was recorded in 6 patients and SSW in 9 (in 2, both were recorded). PFA events showed almost uniform increases in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in "association" cortical areas, as well as brainstem, basal ganglia, and thalamus. SSW showed a different pattern of BOLD signal change with many areas of decreased BOLD signal, mostly in primary cortical areas. Two patients with prior callosotomy had lateralized as well as generalized PFA. The lateralized PFA was associated with a hemispheric version of the PFA pattern we report here. CONCLUSION: PFA is associated with activity in a diffuse network that includes association cortices as well as an unusual pattern of simultaneous activation of subcortical structures (brainstem, thalamus, and basal ganglia). By comparison, the SSW pattern is quite different, with cortical and subcortical activations and deactivations. Regardless of etiology, it appears that 2 key, but distinct, patterns of diffuse brain network involvement contribute to the defining electrophysiologic features of LGS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".