MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017064148 · doi:10.1111/jocd.12099

Evaluation of the effect of fractional <scp>CO</scp>2 laser on histopathological picture and <scp>TGF</scp>‐<i>β</i>1 expression in hypertrophic scar

2014· article· en· W2017064148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineH&E stainMasson's trichrome stainHypertrophic scarImmunohistochemistryWound healingTransforming growth factorPathologyVan Gieson's stainSkin biopsyBiopsyUrologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypertrophic scar is a form of abnormal wound healing process in which tissue repair regulating mechanism is disrupted. Transforming growth factor β1 has a particular importance in the fibrotic scarring response. Treatment of hypertrophic scar included many chemical, physical, and surgical options. Fractional CO2 laser devices have gained acceptance as a way for managing hypertrophic scar. Aims of this study are: (a) to determine the clinical and histopathological effects of fractional CO2 laser on hypertrophic scar, (b) to evaluate the expression pattern of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) as an important fibrogenic factor before and 6 months after fractional CO2 laser treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients of hypertrophic scar were selected, each patient was treated by four sessions with 1 month apart with fractional CO2 laser. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to assess the patients before and after laser treatment. Skin biopsy was taken from eight cases before and 3 months after four fractional CO2 laser sessions and four normal skin control biopsies. All were assessed by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, Van Gieson and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with TGF-β1. The epidermal thickness was assessed before and after treatment by image analyzing system software. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference in VSS before and after fractional CO2 laser (P > 0.001). The epidermal thickness showed significant increase after laser treatment (P > 0.001), and there was also thinning in stratum corneum and replacement of the irregular collagen bands with organized new collagen fibrils as demonstrated by H&E and the other special stains. The study also showed significant decrease in TGF-β1 expression after laser therapy (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Fractional CO2 laser could be considered as a good way for hypertrophic scar management. It normalizes dermal collagen as imaged by histopathological picture and the change in TGF-β1 expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it