Monotherapy with LF 15-0195, an analogue of 15-deoxyspergualin, significantly prolongs renal allograft survival in monkeys1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: LF 15-0195 is a novel, more potent, and less toxic analogue of 15-deoxyspergualin, an antibiotic used as an immunosuppressive agent to prevent rejection of organ transplants. This study was undertaken to determine whether LF 15-0195 monotherapy would prevent renal allograft rejection in a nonhuman primate model. METHODS: In the study groups, recipients received LF 15-0195 monotherapy at doses of 0.065 mg/kg per day (group 2, n=4), 0.13 mg/kg per day (group 3, n=4), or 0.2 mg/kg per day (group 4, n=4), administered subcutaneously, on postoperative days 0 to 14. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of untreated control recipients, all of which developed advanced graft rejection after surviving for an average of 6.5+/-0.6 days. LF 15-0195 treatment significantly prolonged graft survival in groups 2, 3, and 4, to 20+/-20 days, 49+/-5 days, and 39+/-4 days, respectively. Animals in groups 3 and 4 demonstrated no evidence of rejection during LF 15-0195 treatments. The animals maintained stable renal function for 2 weeks after LF 15-0195 withdrawal but gradually developed rejection at 5 to 6 weeks. Pathologic studies demonstrated that vascular graft rejection was attenuated in LF 15-0195-treated allografts, compared with control specimens. These groups also demonstrated transient reductions in lymphocyte counts during treatment, which returned to normal levels 2 weeks after LF 15-0195 withdrawal. Total serum concentrations of IgM and IgG decreased by a mean of 20.4% and a mean of 31.4%, respectively, at the end of LF 15-0195 treatment (postoperative day 14). LF 15-0195 did not significantly alter thrombocyte counts or hemoglobin levels. Necropsy studies showed no evidence of drug toxicity in the heart, liver, spleen, intestines, stomach, or colon. CONCLUSIONS: LF 15-0195 monotherapy significantly prolonged renal allograft survival in monkeys. These encouraging data suggest that this novel agent may be of future value in clinical transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".