MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017099970 · doi:10.1002/ceat.201400340

Relationship between Pyrite in the Precursor and the Pore Structure of High‐Surface Area Activated Carbon Preparations

2014· article· en· W2017099970 on OpenAlexaff
Huaihao Zhang, Yuanyuan Jiang, Kai Chen, Yongfeng Hu, Hui Wang, Jing Zhao, Xiaoxing Zhang, Chengyin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyriteSulfurSulfideChemistryPorosityActivated carbonSpecific surface areaChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryVolume (thermodynamics)ThioetherBET theoryAdsorptionMineralogyCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High‐surface area activated carbons (HAC) were prepared from analogous sulfur‐containing precursors by using KOH chemical activation. The relationship between pyrite (FeS2) in the precursor and the pore structure of the as‐prepared HAC was investigated comprehensively. The results suggest that FeS2 in the precursor reacts with KOH, producing K2SO4, K2S2O3, K2S, thioether (R‐S‐R'), and Fe3O4, which reduce the actual amount of KOH used to develop the porosity. As a result, the existence of the by‐product Fe3O4 further clarifies that FeS2 in the precursor can consume some amount of KOH, which leads to the decrease in the specific surface area and pore volume of HAC. Interestingly, part of the inorganic sulfur from FeS2 in the precursor can be transformed into organic sulfide R‐S‐R'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering & TechnologySame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207