Juvenile-adult associations in sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. droebachiensis: Is nutrition involved?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Juvenile-adult associations (i.e. juvenile sheltering) in sea urchins of the genus Strongylocentrotus provide an example of an important post-settlement behaviour in benthic invertebrates. It has been suggested that these associations provide a nutritional advantage to juveniles by facilitating access to kelp. We examined this hypothesis in a series of growth experiments involving 2 sea urchin species, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. droebachiensis, which show high and low levels of juvenile sheltering, respectively. Juvenile sea urchins (7.73 0.09 mm [mean SE] test diameter) of both species had lower growth rates in the presence versus absence of adults, regardless of food type, though the effect was more pronounced in S. franciscanus (0.2 0.1 vs 1.2 0.3 mm mo -1 ) than in S. droebachiensis (0.8 0.5 vs 1.2 0.7 mm mo -1 ). This relationship was not evident in the absence of food, which leads us to conclude that the reduction in growth is due to intercohort competition. Hence, other post-settlement factors (e.g. predation and hydrodynamic disturbance) are likely responsible for maintaining the juvenile-adult associations observed in S. franciscanus. Species-specific strategies in juvenile sheltering indicate that behavioural processes are important for the recruitment of benthic invertebrates with mobile juvenile stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".