MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017115181 · doi:10.1111/jfd.12024

Cp<scp>G</scp> inclusion in feed reduces sea lice, <i><scp>L</scp>epeophtheirus salmonis</i>, numbers following re‐infection

2012· article· en· W2017115181 on OpenAlexafffund
Sara L. Purcell, Sarah Friend, J.M. Covello, Alan W Donkin, David B. Groman, Jordan Poley, Mark D. Fast

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Diseases · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsCooke Aquaculture (Canada)University of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Prince Edward Island
KeywordsLepeophtheirusBiologyImmune systemSpleenInflammationFish <Actinopterygii>ImmunologyAndrologyMicrobiologySalmoFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lepeophtheirus salmonis infections in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, have been characterized by little to no hyperplastic response and a biphasic immune response that results in chronic inflammation with tissue repair as the infection progresses. We hypothesized that CpG administration with prior lice exposure would enhance epithelial inflammatory mechanisms and boost the Atlantic salmon immune response to L. salmonis, leading to greater protection against infection. We administered multiple exposures of L. salmonis to two groups of Atlantic salmon and compared responses against first-time exposed Atlantic salmon. Following re-exposure, CpG fed fish exhibited increased skin expression of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 β compared to control previously exposed (CPE) and control first-time exposed (CFE) animals, respectively. This inflammatory enhancement occurred with significantly lower expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP 9), both systemically (spleen) and locally (skin). Reduced MMP 9 expression was a hallmark of the re-infected fish (occurred in both tissues at both times). When significant differences were present in the skin or spleen, the two re-exposed groups showed greater similarity than with the first exposure group. Lice numbers on CpG fed fish were significantly lower than CFE fish at 7 days post-re-infection (dpri), and although they were not significantly different at 17 dpri, the trend of lower lice levels remained. CpG fed fish also showed nearly twofold greater protection than CPE when compared to the CFE group (48.5% vs. 27.0% reductions at 7 dpri and 27.2% vs. 13.1% reductions at 17 dpri, respectively). The enhanced protection of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide administration to previous exposure was consistent across all body surfaces and suggests that CpG can not only enhance innate responses to L. salmonis in Atlantic salmon, but also further stimulate adaptive responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish DiseasesSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207