Cp<scp>G</scp> inclusion in feed reduces sea lice, <i><scp>L</scp>epeophtheirus salmonis</i>, numbers following re‐infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lepeophtheirus salmonis infections in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, have been characterized by little to no hyperplastic response and a biphasic immune response that results in chronic inflammation with tissue repair as the infection progresses. We hypothesized that CpG administration with prior lice exposure would enhance epithelial inflammatory mechanisms and boost the Atlantic salmon immune response to L. salmonis, leading to greater protection against infection. We administered multiple exposures of L. salmonis to two groups of Atlantic salmon and compared responses against first-time exposed Atlantic salmon. Following re-exposure, CpG fed fish exhibited increased skin expression of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 β compared to control previously exposed (CPE) and control first-time exposed (CFE) animals, respectively. This inflammatory enhancement occurred with significantly lower expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP 9), both systemically (spleen) and locally (skin). Reduced MMP 9 expression was a hallmark of the re-infected fish (occurred in both tissues at both times). When significant differences were present in the skin or spleen, the two re-exposed groups showed greater similarity than with the first exposure group. Lice numbers on CpG fed fish were significantly lower than CFE fish at 7 days post-re-infection (dpri), and although they were not significantly different at 17 dpri, the trend of lower lice levels remained. CpG fed fish also showed nearly twofold greater protection than CPE when compared to the CFE group (48.5% vs. 27.0% reductions at 7 dpri and 27.2% vs. 13.1% reductions at 17 dpri, respectively). The enhanced protection of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide administration to previous exposure was consistent across all body surfaces and suggests that CpG can not only enhance innate responses to L. salmonis in Atlantic salmon, but also further stimulate adaptive responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".