MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017117197 · doi:10.1196/annals.1391.032

Heat Shock Proteins and Protection of the Nervous System

2007· review· en· W2017117197 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian R. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNeuroprotectionHeat shock proteinHsp70NeuroscienceSynapseCell biologyCentral nervous systemBiologyNervous systemSpinal cordBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manipulation of the cellular stress response offers strategies to protect brain cells from damage induced by ischemia and neurodegenerative diseases. Overexpression of Hsp70 reduced ischemic injury in the mammalian brain. Investigation of the domains within Hsp70 that confers ischemic neuroprotection revealed the importance of the carboxyl-terminal domain. Arimoclomol, a coinducer of heat shock proteins, delayed progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a mouse model in which motor neurons in the spinal cord and motor cortex degenerate. Celastrol, a promising candidate as an agent to counter neurodegenerative diseases, induced expression of a set of Hsps in differentiated neurons grown in tissue culture. Heat shock "preconditioning" protected the nervous system at the functional level of the synapse and selective overexpression of Hsp70 enhanced the level of synaptic protection. Following hyperthermia, constitutively expressed Hsc70 increased in synapse-rich areas of the brain where it associates with Hsp40 to form a complex that can refold denatured proteins. Stress tolerance in neurons is not solely dependent on their own Hsps but can be supplemented by Hsps from adjacent glial cells. Hence, application of exogenous Hsps at neural injury sites is an effective strategy to maintain neuronal viability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations208
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207