MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017137769 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.39.4.1021

RELATIONSHIPS OF COTICULE GEOCHEMISTRY TO STRATIGRAPHY IN THE PERRY MOUNTAIN AND MEGUNTICOOK FORMATIONS, NEW ENGLAND APPALACHIANS

2001· article· en· W2017137769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jennifer A. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEastern Washington University
KeywordsGeologyStratigraphyGeochemistryPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coticules (garnet-rich quartzites) are chemically distinctive lithologies of controversial origin. They generally occur in pelitic schists, amphibolites, cherts, and quartzites as thin layers or discontinuous lenses in Paleozoic formations in the New England Appalachians and other orogenic belts. Geochemical data were collected to characterize coticules and their host rocks from the Middle Silurian Perry Mountain Formation of southern New Hampshire (near Rochester) and western Maine (near Rangeley), and the Cambrian Megunticook Formation of coastal Maine (Camden and Calais). Relative to their host rocks, the coticules are enriched in Fe, Mn, and P, and depleted in Ti and alkalis. Electron-microprobe analyses of garnet show higher spessartine and lower almandine components relative to garnet in the host. Coticules are light- REE -enriched and heavy- REE -depleted. They have concentrations between 10 and 100 times those of chondrites, generally lack a Ce anomaly, and have a negative Eu anomaly. Major-element compositions and REE profiles argue strongly against a hydrothermal origin for these rocks, and do not obviously support a hydrogenous (diagenetic) origin such as Mn–Fe formation. Rare-earth-element patterns differ as much within a local area as for widely separated samples within a single formation. All three samples from the Megunticook Formation are nearly identical, supporting stratigraphic correlation. But they are also like some of the Perry Mountain Formation samples, so that coticule compositions for a formation are not unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207