MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017138309 · doi:10.1063/1.3653380

Gel formation and aging in weakly attractive nanocolloid suspensions at intermediate concentrations

2011· article· en· W2017138309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMaterials scienceChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy (XPCS) and rheometry experiments to study the temporal evolution of gel formation and aging in suspensions of silica nanocolloids possessing a tunable short-range attraction. The colloid volume fractions, φ = 0.20 and 0.43, are below the glass regime at high concentration and above the fractal regime at low concentration. Following a sudden initiation of the interparticle attraction, the suspensions display a protracted latency period in which they remain fluid before acquiring a measurable elastic shear modulus. The duration of the latency period and the subsequent rate of increase of the modulus vary strongly with the strength of the attraction. The XPCS results indicate dynamic heterogeneity among the colloids during this gel formation in which a growing fraction of the particles become localized. The temporal evolution of this localization correlates with that of the rheology. In particular, the time scale over which the fraction of localized particles increases tracks the duration of the latency period. Also, at φ = 0.20 the localization length characterizing the motion of the localized fraction scales onto the shear modulus with no free parameters as predicted by a self-consistent theory based on mode coupling [K. S. Schweizer and G. Yatsenko, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 164505 (2007)], while deviations from the predicted scaling at φ = 0.43 are observed near the gel point. The XPCS results also reveal slow, hyperdiffusive motion of the colloids in the newly formed gels that is attributed to strain from the relaxation of internal stress. While some features of this motion correlate with the evolving rheology, others appear decoupled from the macroscopic mechanical behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it