[Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>]<sup><i>q</i></sup> Cubane Clusters (<i>q</i> = 4+, 3+, 2+) with Terminal Amide Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bis(trimethylsilyl)amide-ligated iron-sulfur cubane clusters [Fe(4)(mu(3)-S)(4)(N{SiMe(3)}(2))(4)](z) (z = 0, 1-, 2-) are accessible by the reaction of FeCl(N{SiMe(3)}(2))(2)(THF) (1) with 1 equiv of NaSH (z = 0), followed by reduction with either 0.25 (z = 1-) or 1 equiv (z = 2-) of Na(2)S as needed. The anionic clusters are obtained as the sodium salts [Na(THF)(2)][Fe(4)S(4)(N{SiMe(3)}(2))(4)] and [Na(THF)(2)](2)[Fe(4)S(4)(N{SiMe(3)}(2))(4)]; in the solid state, these two clusters both possess a unique contact ion pair motif in which individual sodium ions each coordinate to a cluster core sulfide, an adjacent amide nitrogen, and two THF donors. The monoanionic cluster can also be prepared as the lithium salt [Li(THF)(4)][Fe(4)S(4)(N{SiMe(3)}(2))(4)] by the reaction of 1 with 1:0.5 LiCl/Li(2)S. The characterization of the three-membered redox series allows an analysis of redox trends, as well as a study of the effects of the amide donor environment on the [Fe(4)S(4)] core. Bis(trimethylsilyl)amide terminal ligation significantly stabilizes oxidized cluster redox states, permitting isolation of the uncommon [Fe(4)S(4)](3+) and unprecedented [Fe(4)S(4)](4+) weak-field cores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".