MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017143788 · doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2001.183.01.11

Mid- to Late Eocene organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts from ODP Leg 171B, offshore Florida

2001· article· en· W2017143788 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline A. van Mourik, Henk Brinkhuis, Graham L. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsDartmouth General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDinoflagellateSubmarine pipelinePaleontologyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The well-calibrated mid- to late Eocene sediment record of ODP Leg 171B (Site 1053A, Blake Nose) allows a detailed stratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental analysis of the dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) content. The recovered assemblages are a mixture of inner neritic, outer neritic and oceanic species. The autochthonous dinoflagellates, principally those of the Impagidinium group, indicate an oceanic milieu, with possibly some shallowing of water depth towards the top of the section. This trend is also indicated by a corresponding increase of inner neritic dinocysts. The close agreement in the abundance peaks of inner neritic dinocysts and terrestrial palynomorphs indicats that both are allochthonous. This is confirmed by the much higher number of neritic species found in JOIDES Holes 1 and 2, on the continental shelf of eastern Florida, immediately to the west of the Blake Nose. Lower-latitude species found in Hole 1053A, but not occurring at higher latitudes during late Eocene time, are Diphyes colligerum and Thalassiphora delicata . The presence of these, and other lower-latitude species, confirms that warmer-water conditions persisted during mid- to early late Eocene time in the vicinity of Site 1053. Eighteen new taxa are described, two of them formally: Charlesdowniea proserpina sp. nov. and Oligosphaeridium anapetum sp. nov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207