Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explored the association between vitamin D insufficiency and frailty syndrome defined by the Fried Frailty Index (FFI) and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) in a northern Taiwan community. Data of 215 subjects participating in an integrated interventional trial involving community-dwelling older adults with a high frailty risk were analyzed. Subjects were first screened by telephone interview and then evaluated at a local hospital with questionnaires, physical performance tests, and serum 25(OH)D measurements. Of the 215 participants, 31% had 25(OH)D insufficiency (< 20 ng/ml). Frail subjects based on the FFI were older, had lower Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) scores, Barthel Index (BI) scores, and 25(OH)D levels. Using the EFS, frailer cases were more likely to be female, have less education, higher comorbid conditions, lower MMSE scores, lower Barthel Index scores, and lower 25(OH)D levels. The associations between insufficient 25(OH)D status and both frailty scales were significant. After adjustment of variables, the odds ratio of 25(OH)D insufficiency was 10.74 (95% CI 2.60-44.31) for frail versus robust individuals. The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency was high in this population. There was a strong association between vitamin D insufficiency and the FFI. Vitamin D measurements and supplements are suggested for high-risk older people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".